4. 2 WwW
\ d cj 4i ed
Lo cy oe ' WO
5B iJ 7 HG w
So ‘ C j 1% co W { ‘
Hi ( ) 1 § ome] ©
4 hy oO i { im oO w
{i} { oO Ww ti { 1 1 U)
mm Mo DW -d ,
: ' { ov aw 4
1 + p | ) 1 | 1 fy
2, ty { uf c j wG ci + ) ( } 4
i Wn OW Ho 1 t ra |
wh oO Vv ) 0 oO 4
Q oO in W) ~ rm fas)
w TH W-A ‘ Ged = Hi
fey aoa eG | 0 Pp G wo
OM Od ‘ 10O w» On Ho 4H
n {Oud £& Wo U ice) oOo W
' © © a | wu
o q cs ww
. ce m { vada Gu
a = a G ‘ { Ee 0 wv cm 42
= oq yp ) ¥ G eo be
< recd od oe v
= wo Ss Wed
a MH v wv , Oo
+ uo oH WY QO GUO -d rent i)
ke oo30 \ ono oa wo
LL wierd OF \ j qaaoo Gg a
Oo WM Pt pi fet an om,
- cd UW O — o Mm A wo
z Z a) Hi 0) 4b Ged WU
iw a oO wow - O Gon Go oO v
S ; BS o in oO i on O -d oO 2
E c= mod vo HO GOH uD OM
or a, = : c ba dd o i = oO Ss
{ Oo “4 wm O B «ft o
o. Oo Gq ov 3 ore
uw w”) “A : ERU—ao S
oO ‘ vy ) om nm » Ov
= oO oO Mt aE in « ft
oO 13 1 H ENN O oOo W Gl
2 WO oh og OE 0
wo io Oo go Wv Ee G4
a co et Wi Ho uw vo Oo
by oO v ( Oo Vda aA oY E
wu d Oy, vi Oo 4 YEE 4a @
1 1) : dposvodE YW HoH
om O ie) > 6 o0O3 G t J
Ww O ed WM G | OQ ov
t dt G sa yy rd & 6
uo Qn a ri i iv vm AE y W Oo
hi Ed Ss f, A ded -d m wo 44
gq 0 ow Oo 0 Nd vv re)
d O Ee da 1 OES oO - G6 wv
w t ~» £3 (€) pb 3s eo WO 5
uy i a WwW G MH ) ina o yn py» oOo Gd
“A vd vO 4 Sh 10 o n oA - VP
ri Shed 30 0 1ogm ~Q 0 MW oH OH
a — Oris 1 2 ov qo ooo oa
es » UO at 4 om OY adaodd wo Oo EM A,
0 Yo OAs Wa O 6’ OBA GG Ga OWUeE
HG am ws omr a oOohHRM @HY Hm © Heed
Docket Ne. NR5036-14
provisions are intended as an incentive vice a benefit. Members
who are retired are not eligible to transfer. Information about
the Post-9/11 GI Bill has been readily ana publicly available,
and you could have used available resources to educate yourself
on your educational benefits.
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613
(Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11
GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. After current review of
my transfer eligibility, it was brought to my attention that the
system didn’t reflect the transfer and insisted on me re-
‘enrolling’ in the transfer eligibility program again. The re-
enrollment was completed in September of 2015. This request is
submitted to change my record to reflect my original transfer
@ate of 2 August 200%.
* Your application further claims that
“Upon discovery that the website did not recognize my
enrollment, I called and was briefec by VA.GOV rep that there
ange during the time frame covering August
was a program ch
through November 2009. T am not sure why my eligibility was
that did
removed by the Page 13 which I currently maintain shows th
document the proper steps to keep my eligibility date intact.”
The Board found that NAVADMIN 2
provided the procedures members are requ
transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits
03/09 published in June 2009
ixed to follow to
Some of those essential procedures state
spouse/child(ren} is/are enrolled in DEE
election to transfer entitiement; Zz. Ens
obligation (officer ans enlisted; is Dro
electronic service mecore (ESR. pr-9> ac
transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <=
election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc
onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w
portal during
affect the databases that contained the
have not submitted any proof contrary to
the Board members took into consideration, that on
Furthermore,
request to transfer your
16 September 2013 you resubmitted your
Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to your dependents and was approved
on 16 September 2013, subsequently acquiring an obligation end
date of 15 September 2017. You will be reguired to remain on
active duty until 15 September 2017 in order for your dependents
to remain eligible for your entitlements. Under these
circumstances, the Board found that no relief is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
Docket No. NR5036-14
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered hy The Roars
eed! vex: ane Th a | =
prior Lo taking dis decisivn ii this case. in cans Tegesc, =<
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincepyely,
ROBERT’ J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosures: 1. CNPC memo 1780 PERS-314 of 7 Oct 14
2, CNPC memo 1780 PERS-314 of 22 Dec 14
a
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6468 14
{ ) al r a) ¢ a Tm 6d \ > gus oO 4 t cd ie) ) i ) r AUT) oti C { QO -d C ay) ty 43 GS o S es b Docket No. Members who are retired are not eligible to cransfer your education benefits. The Board found that there was not revision to the Post-9/11 GI Bill law or policy in December 2009 as you claim.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6761 14
)¢ OR i z = ce Py Oo om Pe Hw YU Q) o 4 w cd Oop GQ i St) ~ 3 uO oO O oO Mm o ow Wi @ o iW Oo 1) Ow 3 wm o i @ oH oa rc Q oO wm @ Yo aoa G fx ag Ww o Ho o,nn oD SG wy 2 Hed & OV Qa Oo HS Qo44 Hi E 1 gm O Youn o oH U Ee “cl wv 1 ~ oH ow “ ou vO rd My oy ed ri} 3. 0Ort > WO © oO G am vo 4 ) + co Up ICel beca law ed as an ea r ena 15 4 provi Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14
Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5361 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case Eile. After careful and conscientious consideration of the enti record, the Board determined the letter from the Depart Veterans Affairs stating you are being treated for s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5325 14
mst ae ‘ 1 ‘ Ceewul Ti, oe ro b rT Ol? rE J < p INF C Cc ] 4 ) { } 4 THE NAVY catl ) c - ON . ory Pit saa > Cc EN 2R % W anmtlle COF EPARTM mz D ExASCCULL in BOA « suant i ren = 14 t 4 7a ox, WLCE nemb & \ LC ywyeraAg Net ae Ay Uol mars saaayyeto sieays als Cre i m+ W) ov 3 W ov g oO dt ) Y ma mous 4 Mt a) ”n 44 1 a 1 1 wo { ) Doh ei iv P) het yy 3 O Oo ec 4) rd ii} 4 BC gm 1) HH OW) Oo Vv OS Ee U d © aa) wm jp Hd Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6742 14
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5881 14
NAVY E DEPARTMENT OF TH a u r £ E 1 4 ‘ 4 i Go 4 Gb ne Bo 4H O ) { ‘ 4 1 Amini SAUL ii) p=) { Oa HOG YO py « n T wv a un) Oo im Oo ore O rp Oo @ on a 1 a a PA dd UO 4 vo cD ~ 2 oO OH S Q Vv G& Ox dh Pp ow OH id ume U2 crorde: oe Ny Rea rant Will comments ished 1 publ ns ulLatio ni er rTeTnd fit crewW1y re actly ad my ) memir a lectio Docket No. NR586i-14 who are retired are not eligible to transfer their education benefits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14
FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.